Wednesday 26 January 2011

Waste strategy

I didn't go to Lambeth's budget consultation on Saturday because as far as I'm concerned I've only really been consulted if I get my own way and sadly this was not going to be the case because Lambeth's new waste "strategy" is all sewn up. And as that's about the only council service I use, it seemed a bit pointless.

Anyway, apparently the booklet explaining the small print of the new "strategy" will be available in March but in the meantime here are a few highlights:

1. The cost of getting a bulky item collected will be £20. To get the best possible value you can sit on your bulky item until you have amassed a further three and get rid of them all for £20.

2. There will be no more garden waste collection unless you join a scheme which will cost you £35 a year.

It's enough to make you move to Wivenhoe.

I button-holed Lambeth Streetcare's Keith Naish and shared my concerns about the effect these changes will have on our environment - in particular the prospect of the return of fly-tipping to Tradescant Road.

Keith assured me that they had benchmarked the likely impact by talking to other councils and that they were confident that there would not be a sudden increase in fly-tipping.

If there is a problem:
  • One aid to identifying culprits might be to borrow Lambeth's mobile CCTV camera for a week. If possible, Lambeth will prosecute although at present that they prosecute only about two or three a month.
  • The caged vehicles which patrol the streets picking up fly-tip items will continue to run although this service will be reduced.
But, of course, it would be preferable not to have any fly-tipping in the first place.

On this topic I also received an email from Lambeth's Waste Strategy Manager Kevin Crook who said:
I appreciate your concern that the change may lead to an increase in flytipping. However, a recent national exercise analysed flytipping data from several local authorities which had introduced charges for bulky waste collection. The consensus was that introducing charges had no effect upon flytipping levels. The explanation given was that most residents are generally law-abiding and don’t want the stress associated with being caught and fined for flytipping. The small percentage of residents with the mentality to flytip will do so whether we charge or not. Whilst it is impossible to know what the impact in Lambeth will be it is the case that when we stopped taking non-recyclable waste at the Reuse & Recycling Centre in Norwood there were similar concerns expressed that flytipping would increase. In fact, apart from a blip in the week following the change, the long-term downward trend in flytipping incidents continued unabated.

Of course where fly-tipping does occur we will investigate, where necessary take enforcement action and remove the waste as quickly as possible to help prevent further instances occurring. We are sensitive to the problems that have occurred in Tradescant Road in the past and I understand that you have met with Keith Naish recently to discuss your concerns. Keith tells me he has committed to extra monitoring and enforcement if necessary to prevent a return to past levels of flytipping.
So, there you are. Now we will just have to wait and see.

To report fly-tipping contact the Lambeth Streetcare Service Centre on 020 7926 9000, email streetcarecallcentre@lambeth.gov.uk or use the online dumped rubbish reporting form.

5 comments:

  1. The new waste strategy completely ignores the impact policy changes will have on the people of the Borough saddled with following them. I've read through some of the documents and find it really disheartening that not a thought is given cost-benefit analysis, or how residents will be affected.

    It never considers what people actually want from the waste collection service, as opposed to the targets the government has decided we will meet.

    The preamble to the main waste strategy document mentions a consultative survey, yet its results never come up. There's not one consideration for the extra burden placed on residents (or, how much easier the new strategy will makes their lives - ha, that would be the day).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10:25 pm

    It's 16th March and I've just read a letter addressed to me as 'Garden waste service user'. It is completely obvious that the new strategy is to raise revenue due to Government cuts and the famous deficit. So why patronise us all with explaining it's a new Waste Strategy. It's not. It is to raise revenue so why not say so. I have about 8 bags a year collected from my house so this will be an expensive service for me and I'm not going to buy something I'm already buying through payment of my Council tax and my Business Rates. Blah, blah.... And then £10 for an extra bag collection. And then bio-degradable bags at £15 for a roll of 10. £1.50 each? Have the council gone even madder? Are they taking the piss? Did anyone do any research on the cost of these bags - I'm off to Sainsbury's or Poundland to buy my rolls of bags.........of course it will lead to more fly-tipping, or dumping garden waste in landfill or Council estate bins.........now don't get me started on Trader Permit Scratch cards - £2.60 a day to £18.75 a day in one go from February. Who do Lambeth Council think pay for these permits? It's the householder employing a plumber, an electrician, a builder. One man/woman and a van. Not Balfour Beatty or Conway. Well plumber, here's your Visitor Parking Permit at £5 a day. It just won't work to raise revenue and it is of course, utterly blithering incompetance to think anyone will buy them any more. Sorry to digress..... James

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indeed. And I still can't bring myself to write about the new patronising, hectoring and utterly disingenuous booklet that has come through the door recently.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So, what Lambeth Council has now done is bring in a tax on... having a garden. This must be a new low in the Council's miserable green space policy.

    People probably won't run out to chop down their wisteria because it now costs them an extra £35 per year, but surely this tax is a nudge in that direction. How sad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Matt - you must do the decent thing by chopping down all bushes and trees and paving over your garden. Then the problem goes away.

    ReplyDelete

Please do not leave anonymous comments. At least leave your first name!

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.